What’s the “REAL” reason behind $4.00/gallon gas?

OK… when crude oil was $99 per barrel, gasoline at the pump was $3.00 per gallon.

Now that gasoline has hit $4.00 per gallon at the pump, one would think crude prices have skyrocketed.

They haven’t! Crude oil prices have been consistently at $102.00 – $106.00 per barrel. Today’s price is $104 per barrel. Yet the pump price remains at $3.899 per gallon of gasoline.

So, we have a 33% increase at the pump for a 5% to 9% increase of crude.

In talking with my buds at BP, Marathon, and Shell, I found the REAL reason for the spike in gasoline prices… a mild winter.

That’s right… a mild winter has led to less demand of Heating Oil. So the Oil producers have made far less money this winter than projected.

And, as any businessman will tell you, “Meeting Projections” are what careers are made of.

To get their Corporate earnings to meet projections, a crisis had to be created.

And an oil crisis was created… and ignored by Washington. The Congress and Senate have both ignored the crisis and the pleas of Americans to intervene and do something about it.

As long as Politicians are in the pocket of the rich… NOTHING will ever change for us “ordinary” Americans!

We have to get the Lobbyists and Special Interest groups out of Washington… and out of our lives!

It’s not the Government that’s screwing up everything… it’s the Congress and Senate getting rich taking money from Lobbyists and Special Interest groups!

It will not change until we start sticking together and stop “blaming” each other.

Vote them ALL out… if they are in Washington, they ARE the problem!

GadaboutUS

No Comments - Click here to leave a comment

Romney’s ‘Swiss bank account’ draws fire from Obama

This time it’s personal (again). President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign on Tuesday unveiled a new television ad, set to run in the battleground states of Virginia, Ohio and Iowa, accusing Mitt Romney of sending jobs overseas.

“It’s just what you’d expect from a guy who had a Swiss bank account,” the narrator says, as the screen flashes a photograph of Romney and the news headline “Romney Failed to Disclose Swiss Bank Account Income.”

The 30-second ad continues an Obama campaign strategy of picking what seem to be personal fights with the former Massachusetts governor. Shortly after the video’s release, Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt piled on, tweeting: “There are only 2 reasons to have a Swiss bank account: hedging against the dollar or avoiding paying fair share in taxes.” (Not included: “being Swiss.”)

The ad also takes aim at Romney’s core message: that his business success makes him better qualified to pump up the fragile economy and create jobs.

“As a corporate CEO, he shipped American jobs to places like Mexico and China,” the narrator says. “As governor, he outsourced state jobs to a call center in India.”

The ad condemns conservative super PAC ads assailing Obama for backing loans to green-energy firms that failed or shipped jobs overseas, pointing to findings by independent fact-checking organizations that those criticisms are misleading.

The Romney campaign did not immediately return a request for comment.

What do YOU think, America?     Get Involved !!!     Be Informed !!!

GadaboutUS

No Comments - Click here to leave a comment

Obama and Bill Clinton campaign together on economy

Former President Bill Clinton gave a rousing endorsement of fellow Democrat Barack Obama in his first 2012 campaign appearance with the president on Sunday night, and helped him raise more than $2 million.

A white-haired and svelte Clinton, 65, pounded the podium and pointed at the crowd while addressing about 500 Obama supporters outside the Virginia home of his friend and Democratic adviser Terry McAuliffe.

“I think he’s done a good job,” he told the crowd in his signature raspy voice, warmly introducing the man who beat his wife, Hillary Clinton, to win the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination and then made her secretary of state. “We are going the right direction under President Obama’s leadership.”

Clinton’s support could be pivotal for Obama’s efforts to raise money and to sell voters on his economic plans, which Republicans have denounced as fiscally reckless and rooted in populism instead of good business sense.

Clinton oversaw one of the most prosperous times in recent American history and managed to balance the federal budget, something Democrats are keen to remind voters before the November 6 election.

When he took the backyard podium, Obama, 50, noted Clinton’s “remarkable” economic record in his two White House terms and referred frequently to the political powerhouse standing behind him, who stands to be a huge fundraising force in the final months of the presidential campaign.

“I didn’t run for president simply to get back to where we were in 2007. I didn’t run for president simply to restore the status quo before the financial crisis. I ran for president because we had lost our way since Bill Clinton was done being president,” Obama said.

The state of the economy is expected to be the pivotal issue for voters in November.

With unemployment still relatively high and growth showing signs of slowing, Obama is under pressure to defend his string of big budget deficits and prove the soundness of his proposals to keep spending on infrastructure, clean energy and education and to raise taxes on the very rich.

‘NOT HOUDINI’

Neither Obama nor Clinton referred to George W. Bush, the Republican who served two presidential terms in between their tenures, nor the presumptive Republican nominee for this year’s White House race, Mitt Romney, by name in their outdoor remarks.

But Clinton said Obama’s likely White House opponent this year wanted to revert to the policies that plunged the United States into crisis, but “on steroids, which will get you the same consequences as before, on steroids.”

Clinton applauded Obama’s efforts in healthcare, clean energy promotion and student loan reform, and argued that employment levels were rebounding quickly from the financial and mortgage crises that took hold before Obama took office.

“Look, the man’s not Houdini, all he can do is beat the clock. He’s beating the clock,” he said, comparing the pace of recovery to Japan’s extended weakness after its own crisis. “The last thing you want to do is to turn around and embrace the policies that got us into trouble in the first place.”

Fresh from the previous night’s White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner, where he took several digs at Romney, Obama was clearly in good humor at the Virginia event.

Turning to foreign policy, Obama said he and Hillary Clinton had “spent the last three and a half years cleaning up other folks’ messes,” and made fun of Romney’s recent comment that Russia was the United States’ “No. 1 geopolitical foe.”

“I’m suddenly thinking, ‘What? Maybe I didn’t check the calendar this morning. I didn’t know we were back in 1975,’” he said. The comment echoed Vice President Joe Biden’s criticism last week of Romney as being stuck in a Cold War mindset.

Clinton had not appeared with Obama this election cycle. But last week the Obama campaign released a video of Clinton praising Obama for approving the commando raid that killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan last May.

Tickets to Sunday’s outdoor reception cost $1,000 and up, and Obama and Clinton later addressed a more exclusive dinner at McAuliffe’s home for 80 people who paid $20,000 each. The money went to a fund supporting Obama’s re-election, the Democratic National Committee and several state Democratic parties.

What do YOU think, America?     Be Informed !!!     Get Involved !!!

GadaboutUS

No Comments - Click here to leave a comment

Romney: ‘Borrow Money From Your Parents’

Mitt Romney’s latest business advice might not be the most effective way to win over young voters.
At a talk Friday at Ohio’s Otterbein University, the presidential candidate offered his expertise to a room of students, telling them that if they want to start a business or pay for their education, they should just borrow from mom and dad. “Take a shot, go for it, take a risk, get the education, borrow money if you have to from your parents, start a business,” he said, citing a friend of his who took out a $20,000 loan from his parents.
One mistakenly spoke of Czechoslovakia, which was divided into two countries in 1993, while another attacked Obama for failing to lead the free world, saying, “We are seeing the Soviets pushing into the Arctic with no response from us.”
SO… Romney want ANOTHER WAR???
Romney BELIEVES that “War is the best Business for America!”
Get Involved, America!!!
GadaboutUS

 

No Comments - Click here to leave a comment

Jailed for $280: The Return of Debtors’ Prisons

How did breast cancer survivor Lisa Lindsay end up behind bars? She didn’t pay a medical bill – one the Herrin, Ill., teaching assistant was told she didn’t owe. “She got a $280 medical bill in error and was told she didn’t have to pay it,” The Associated Press reports. “But the bill was turned over to a collection agency, and eventually state troopers showed up at her home and took her to jail in handcuffs.”

Although the U.S. abolished debtors’ prisons in the 1830s, more than a third of U.S. states allow the police to haul people in who don’t pay all manner of debts, from bills for health care services to credit card and auto loans. In parts of Illinois, debt collectors commonly use publicly funded courts, sheriff’s deputies, and country jails to pressure people who owe even small amounts to pay up, according to the AP.

[Related: 5 Strategies to Pay Down Credit Card Debt]

Under the law, debtors aren’t arrested for nonpayment, but rather for failing to respond to court hearings, pay legal fines, or otherwise showing “contempt of court” in connection with a creditor lawsuit. That loophole has lawmakers in the Illinois House of Representatives concerned enough to pass a bill in March that would make it illegal to send residents of the state to jail if they can’t pay a debt. The measure awaits action in the senate.

“Creditors have been manipulating the court system to extract money from the unemployed, veterans, even seniors who rely solely on their benefits to get by each month,” Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said last month in a statement voicing support for the legislation. “Too many people have been thrown in jail simply because they’re too poor to pay their debts. We cannot allow these illegal abuses to continue.”

Debt collectors typically avoid filing suit against debtors, a representative with the Illinois Collectors Association tells the AP. “A consumer that has been arrested or jailed can’t pay a debt. We want to work with consumers to resolve issues,” he said.

Yet Illinois isn’t the only state where residents get locked up for owing money. A 2010 report by the American Civil Liberties Union that focused on only five states – Georgia, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Washington — found that people were being jailed at “increasingly alarming rates” over legal debts. Cases ranged from a woman who was arrested four separate times for failing to pay $251 in fines and court costs related to a fourth-degree misdemeanor conviction, to a mentally ill juvenile jailed by a judge over a previous conviction for stealing school supplies.

According to the ACLU: “The sad truth is that debtors’ prisons are flourishing today, more than two decades after the Supreme Court prohibited imprisoning those who are too poor to pay their legal debts. In this era of shrinking budgets, state and local governments have turned aggressively to using the threat and reality of imprisonment to squeeze revenue out of the poorest defendants who appear in their courts.”

[Related: Spring Cleaning for Your Financial Records]

Some states also apply “poverty penalties,” including late fees, payment plan fees, and interest when people are unable to pay all their debts at once, according to a report by the New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice. Alabama charges a 30 percent collection fee, for instance, while Florida allows private debt collectors to add a 40 percent surcharge on the original debt. Some Florida counties also use so-called collection courts, where debtors can be jailed but have no right to a public defender.

“Many states are imposing new and often onerous ‘user fees’ on individuals with criminal convictions,” the authors of the Brennan Center report wrote. “Yet far from being easy money, these fees impose severe — and often hidden — costs on communities, taxpayers, and indigent people convicted of crimes. They create new paths to prison for those unable to pay their debts and make it harder to find employment and housing as well to meet child-support obligations.”

Such practices, heightened in recent years by the effects of the recession, amount to criminalizing poverty, say critics in urging federal authorities to intervene. “More people are unemployed, more people are struggling financially, and more creditors are trying to get their debt paid,” Madigan told the AP.

SHAME !!!     SHAME !!!     SHAME !!!

What do YOU think, America?     Add your voice !!!

GadaboutUS

No Comments - Click here to leave a comment

“Do Nothing” Congress Plays Politics As U.S. Careens Toward Fiscal Disaster

Lawmakers return to the Hill this week and two divisive proposals high are on the agenda: the Buffett Rule and the Keystone XL Pipeline.

Both measures have strong public support but are expected to languish in the highly partisan Congress. Neither Democrats nor Republicans have shown an eagerness to compromise before the November presidential election.

The Buffett Rule, which the Senate is expected to vote on today, raises the minimum tax rate on the wealthiest Americans. The law would impact 433,000 households — or 0.3 percent of all U.S. taxpayers — according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. The proposal would collect an estimated $47 billion of revenue for the federal government, which critics denounce as too little to reduce the nation’s $1.2 trillion federal budget deficit.

A new Gallup poll finds that 60 percent of Americans support the Buffett Rule while 37 percent oppose it.

Both parties in Washington are pushing proposals that have little chance of passing either the House or Senate. Democrats want to hike taxes on the rich while the Republicans are maneuvering to have the Keystone XL pipeline approved as part of a short-term extension of federal transportation funding.

Nearly 60 percent of Americans are in favor of the Keystone XL pipeline, according to a March 22 Gallup survey.

President Obama rejected the $7 billion pipeline earlier this year but has since given the green light to build the southern portion of the pipeline that extends from Oklahoma to the Gulf Coast. The White House has acknowledged that its decision to delay the construction of the entire pipeline — from Canada to the Gulf — has bruised the president’s standing with some voters.

The Buffett Rule and the Keystone pipeline are just two issues that Congress needs to address in the next nine months. The Bush era tax cuts are set to expire on Dec. 31 as is the payroll tax holiday, extended unemployment benefits and other “temporary” stimulus programs. The $1.2 billion in automatic cuts to the defense budget and various domestic programs due to the failure of the so-called Super Committee go into effect January 2013.

If lawmakers cannot put aside their policy differences and work together, the entire country could face an economic and fiscal disaster.

We have a “do-nothing government,” Henry Blodget tells Aaron Task in the accompanying video. “Nobody has a plan other than to criticize what the other party wants. Someone wins politically and the rest of us loses.”

Aaron and Henry both agree that the nation’s budget woes can be resolved — but only with a combination of tax increases and spending cuts. Whether Washington can make the hard decisions needed to stave off a debt crisis remains to be seen. “We’re heading toward a fiscal cliff,” Aaron notes.

Europe has decided to take the austerity path to prosperity and the European countries most affected by the crisis are suffering even more — not less. A New York Times article over the weekend reported that Europe has a new challenge on its hands: “suicide by economic crisis.”

A growing number of Europeans are killing themselves because the economic environment in their home countries remains bleak. This is a tragic and distressing outcome of the European debt crisis that few governments could have envisaged. While the U.S. debt situation has not yet reached the levels that have shaken Europe, the decisions that could determine the nation’s economic future lies in Washington’s hands.

What do YOU think, America?   Personally, I’m sick and tired of our “Do-nothing except blame the other side” Senate and Congress!

GadaboutUS

No Comments - Click here to leave a comment

Companies use popular provision to avoid income taxes

More than two dozen Fortune 500 companies paid no U.S. federal income taxes in recent years partly because of a corporate tax break that is broadly supported by Republicans and Democrats alike, a consumer group said on Monday.

In at least half of the cases cited by the group, companies made use of accelerated depreciation, a tax provision that allows increased deductions in the early years of the life of an asset.

Citizens for Tax Justice, which advocates steeper corporate taxes, said it surveyed major U.S. companies and found that 26 on average paid no net federal income taxes between 2008 and 2011, among them General Electric and Duke Energy.

“This isn’t fair to the rest of us,” said Bob McIntyre, director of the left-leaning tax research group.

“Things do not get changed in the tax code unless someone asks,” McIntyre said, blaming company lobbying for a failure to thoroughly overhaul the U.S. tax code in 25 years.

Accelerated depreciation will cost the U.S. Treasury $37 billion between 2010 and 2014, according to a recent estimate by Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation.

Still, both President Barack Obama and Republicans have backed an expansion of the tax break through bonus depreciation, which gives companies an even faster and larger first-year write-off. Many policymakers backing accelerated depreciation have cited the need to jump-start the economic recovery.

Disparate tax rates between companies that heavily use accelerated depreciation and those that cannot is among inequities that are prompting lawmakers to begin debate on simplifying the tax code through a major rewrite. The last such rewrite occurred 25 years ago under President Ronald Reagan.

The U.S. government’s corporate tax receipts have been dwindling for decades, in part because of a plethora of special tax provisions in the code.

Revenue from corporate income taxes fell from between 5 percent and 6 percent of gross domestic product in the early 1950s to about 1.3 percent of GDP in 2010, according to the Tax Policy Center, another tax research group.

General Electric keeps its tax rate low — an average negative 19 percent between 2008 and 2011 — primarily by using tax benefits from its leasing business to offset profits in other units, such as the company’s finance arm, McIntyre said.

“All of our businesses, to some extent, have a lower total tax liability as a result of tax incentives at the federal, state or local level for certain investments and activities,” GE spokesman Andrew Williams said.

GE will pay U.S. taxes of about $1 billion for 2011 after three years of having paid no cash taxes, according to CTJ.

The company did not dispute those figures but said it will pay $2.9 billion for 2011 across all the countries where it operates.

Duke Energy’s average negative 3.5 percent tax rate over the four-year period largely resulted from accelerated depreciation, according to the CTJ study.

Duke spokesman Tom Williams said the study is misleading.

“We’re in a modernization phase now and we’ll have four new plants by the end of this year,” Williams said. “They cost $7 billion and so we’re taking the tax benefits allowed.”

Williams said the taxes will be paid eventually over the life of the assets. McIntyre said that may be true in some cases, but the companies can keep deferring taxes by generating more depreciation breaks.

Is this FAIR, America?     Welcome to the Best Congress and Senate that MONEY CAN BUY !!!

GadaboutUS

 

No Comments - Click here to leave a comment

Study ties oil, gas production to Midwest quakes

Oil and gas production may explain a sharp increase in small earthquakes in the nation’s midsection, a new study from the U.S. Geological Survey suggests.

The rate has jumped six-fold from the late 20th century through last year, the team reports, and the changes are “almost certainly man-made.”

Outside experts were split in their opinions about the report, which is not yet published but is due to be presented at a meeting later this month.

The study said a relatively mild increase starting in 2001 comes from increased quake activity in a methane production area along the state line between Colorado and New Mexico. The increase began about the time that methane production began there, so there’s a “clear possibility” of a link, says lead author William Ellsworth of the USGS.

The increase over the nation’s midsection has gotten steeper since 2009, due to more quakes in a variety of oil and gas production areas, including some in Arkansas and Oklahoma, the researchers say.

It’s not clear how the earthquake rates might be related to oil and gas production, the study authors said. They note that others have linked earthquakes to injecting huge amounts of leftover waste-water deep into the earth.

There has been concern about potential earthquakes from a smaller-scale injection of fluids during a process known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which is used to recover gas. But Ellsworth said Friday he is confident that fracking is not responsible for the earthquake trends his study found, based on prior studies.

The study covers a swath of the United States that lies roughly west of Ohio and east of Utah. It counted earthquakes of magnitude 3 and above.

Magnitude 3 quakes are mild, and may be felt by only a few people in the upper floors of buildings, or may cause parked cars to rock slightly. The biggest counted in the study was a magnitude-5.6 quake that hit Oklahoma last Nov. 5, damaging dozens of homes. Experts said it was too strong to be linked to oil and gas production.

The researchers reported that from 1970 to 2000, the region they studied averaged about 21 quakes a year. That rose to about 29 a year for 2001 through 2008, they wrote, and the three following years produced totals of 50, 87 and 134, respectively.

The study results make sense and are likely due to man-made stress in the ground, said Rowena Lohman, a Cornell University geophysicist.

“The key thing to remember is magnitude 3s are really small,” Lohman said. “We’ve seen this sort of behavior in the western United States for a long time.”

Usually, it’s with geothermal energy, dams or prospecting. With magnitude 4 quakes, a person standing on top of them would at most feel like a sharp jolt, but mostly don’t last long enough to be a problem for buildings, she said.

The idea is to understand how the man-made activity triggers quakes, she said. One possibility is that the injected fluids change the friction and stickiness of minerals on fault lines. Another concept is that they change the below-surface pressure because the fluid is trapped and builds, and then “sets off something that’s about ready to go anyway,” Lohman said.

But another expert was not convinced of a link to oil and gas operations.

Austin Holland, the Oklahoma state seismologist, said the new work presents an “interesting hypothesis” but that the increase in earthquake rates could simply be the result of natural processes.

Holland said clusters of quakes can occur naturally, and that scientists do not yet fully understand the natural cycles of seismic activity in the central United States. Comprehensive earthquake records for the region go back only a few decades, he said, while natural cycles stretch for tens of thousands of years. So too little is known to rule out natural processes for causing the increase, he said.

What do YOU think, America?

GadaboutUS

No Comments - Click here to leave a comment

Scientists warn of ‘emergency on global scale’

Leading scientists on Thursday called on the upcoming Rio Summit to grapple with environmental ills that they said pointed to “a humanitarian emergency on a global scale.”

In a “State of the Planet” declaration issued after a four-day conference, the scientists said Earth was now facing unprecedented challenges, from water stress, pollution and species loss to spiralling demands for food.

They called on the June 20-22 followup to the 1992 Earth Summit to overhaul governance of the environment and sweep away a fixation with GDP as the sole barometer of well-being.

“The continuing function of the Earth system as it has supported the wellbeing of human civilisation in recent centuries is at risk,” said the statement issued at the “Planet Under Pressure” conference.

“These threats risk intensifying economic, ecological and social crises, creating the potential for a humanitarian emergency on a global scale.”

The conference gathered nearly 3,000 environment scientists, economists, business executives and policymakers in the run-up to the UN Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio.

In a recorded message, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said he welcomed the declaration, saying “its timing… could not be better.”

“Climate change, the financial crisis and food, water and energy security threaten human wellbeing and civilisation as we know it,” he said.

Ban added that he was considering appointing a scientific board or a chief scientific advisor to advise him and other UN organs.

The conference declaration said humanity’s impact on Earth was now so great that a new era — “the Anthropocene,” a term derived from the Greek word for human — had emerged.

Globalization has shown that economies and societies are now “highly interconnected and interdependent,” it said.

These changes have brought stability and innovation but created a system vulnerable to sudden stress, as the global financial meltdown and surge in food prices had shown.

Tackling the problems of global environment change will mean major reforms, it said.

One is the question of governance.

“Existing international arrangements are not dealing quickly enough with current global challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss,” said the statement.

It called for a “poly-centric approach” for planetary stewardship, meaning a diverse partnership between local, national and regional governments that also includes business and grassroots groups.

But another need was to scrap obsessions with gross domestic product (GDP) as the only benchmark of progress. Governments should also include environment, health and social factors.

“A crucial transformation is to move away from income as the key constituent of well-being and to develop new indicators that measure actual improvements in well-being at all scales,” the declaration said.

What do YOU think, America?

GadaboutUS

No Comments - Click here to leave a comment

What’s the “REAL” reason behind $4.00/gallon gas?

OK… when crude oil was $99 per barrel, gasoline at the pump was $3.00 per gallon.

Now that gasoline has hit $4.00 per gallon at the pump, one would think crude prices have skyrocketed.

They haven’t! Crude oil prices have been consistently at $104.00 – $108.00 per barrel. Today’s price is $106 per barrel. Yet the pump price remains at $3.949 per gallon of gasoline.

So, we have a 33% increase at the pump for a 5% to 9% increase of crude.

In talking with my buds at BP, Marathon, and Shell, I found the REAL reason for the spike in gasoline prices… a mild winter.

That’s right… a mild winter has led to less demand of Heating Oil. So the Oil producers have made far less money this winter than projected.

And, as any businessman will tell you, “Meeting Projections” are what careers are made of.

To get their Corporate earnings to meet projections, a crisis had to be created.

And an oil crisis was created… and ignored by Washington. The Congress and Senate have both ignored the crisis and the pleas of Americans to intervene and do something about it.

As long as Politicians are in the pocket of the rich… NOTHING will ever change for us “ordinary” Americans!

We have to get the Lobbyists and Special Interest groups out of Washington… and out of our lives!

It’s not the Government that’s screwing up everything… it’s the Congress and Senate getting rich taking money from Lobbyists and Special Interest groups!

It will not change until we start sticking together and stop “blaming” each other.

Vote them ALL out… if they are in Washington, they ARE the problem!

Gadabout

 

No Comments - Click here to leave a comment